Stinson et al v. Allen et al

Filing 18

ORDER dismissing without prejudice Barker's claims for failure to comply with the Court's February 5, 2015 Order. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/20/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION BRANDON STINSON; MARK BARKER; and MARCUS BROWN v. PLAINTIFFS NO. 3:14CV00308 JLH/BD MIKE ALLEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Brandon Stinson, an inmate at the Crittenden County Detention Facility, filed this lawsuit pro se on behalf of himself, as well as Mark Barker and Marcus Brown. Document #2. On January 5, 2015, the Court ordered plaintiffs Barker and Brown to file a complete in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application or pay the statutory filing fee within thirty days.1 Document #3. On February 5, 2015, Barker filed an IFP application, but failed to submit all necessary documents. Document #4. Therefore, his IFP application was denied. Document #5. The Court again instructed Barker to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail information sheet, or pay the statutory filing fee within thirty days. The Court cautioned Barker that his claims could be dismissed if he did not comply with the Court’s February 5, 2015 Order. To date, Barker has not complied with the Court’s Order, and the time for doing so has passed. Therefore, Barker’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to comply withe the Court’s February 5, 2015 Order. Local Rule 5.5. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of March, 2015. __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 The Court previously dismissed plaintiff Brown’s claims. Document #7.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?