Glidewell v. Martin

Filing 9

ORDER: Unopposed recommendation, 7 , declined. Glidewell's complaint may well state a claim. But Glidewell hasn't kept his address current or given more details on his claim as directed. The Complaint will therefore be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/23/2015. (jak)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JONAS GLIDEWELL v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:15-cv-3-DPM-JTK JOEY MARTIN, Administrator, Poinsett County Jail DEFENDANT ORDER Unopposed recommendation, NQ 7, declined. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Notes). Glidewell's complaint may well state a claim about giving some prisoners more food in return for them not suing the jail. But Glidewell hasn't kept his address current or given more details on his claim as directed. The complaint will therefore be dismissed for failure to prosecute. LOCAL RULE 5.5(c). So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?