Rupert v. Mills et al
Filing
61
ORDER adopting the 57 Partial Recommended Disposition in all respects. Defendant Redic-Young's motion, 52 , is granted and Rupert's claims against her are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/3/2015. (jak)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
PRENTIS RUPERT
ADC # 140061
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:15CV00022 BSM
LARRY MILLS et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Beth Deere and plaintiff Prentis Rupert’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After
careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the PRD is
hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Redic-Young’s motion [Doc. No. 52]
is granted and Rupert’s claims against her are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of November 2015.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
