Rupert v. Mills et al

Filing 80

JUDGMENT pursuant to 79 Verdict that on plaintiff Prentis Rupert's due process claim against defendant Larry Mills, in his official capacity, judgment is rendered for Rupert and Rupert shall recover from Poinsett County, Arkansas damages in t he amount of $5,750. Rupert shall have 14 days in which to file his motion for costs and Larry Mills shall have 7 days to respond. It is ordered that, on Ruperts due process claim against Mills, in his individual capacity, judgment is rendered for Mills and Rupert's claim is dismissed with prejudice. It is ordered that, on Rupert's deliberate indifference claim against defendant Susan Cox, judgment is rendered for Cox and Rupert's claim is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/2/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION PRENTIS RUPERT v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00022 BSM LARRY MILLS and SUSAN COX DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the verdict entered today; IT IS ORDERED that, on plaintiff Prentis Rupert’s due process claim against defendant Larry Mills, in his official capacity, judgment is rendered for Rupert and Rupert shall recover from Poinsett County, Arkansas damages in the amount of Five Thousand, Seven Hundred, Fifty dollars ($5750). Rupert shall have fourteen (14) days in which to file his motion for costs and Larry Mills, in his official capacity, shall have seven (7) days to respond; IT IS ORDERED that, on Rupert’s due process claim against Mills, in his individual capacity, judgment is rendered for Mills and Rupert’s claim is dismissed with prejudice; and IT IS ORDERED that, on Rupert’s deliberate indifference claim against defendant Susan Cox, judgment is rendered for Cox and Rupert’s claim is dismissed with prejudice. DATED this 2nd day of September 2016. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?