Bausley v. Does
ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/9/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Plaintiff Charles Bausley has not responded to the Court’s January 29, 2015 Order
(Document #2) directing him to pay the $400 filing fee for this action or file a motion to proceed in
forma pauperis. Therefore, his complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to
prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).1
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2015.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rule LR5.5(c)(2) of the Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and
Western Districts of Arkansas provides as follows:
It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and
the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor
the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently . . . . If any
communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty
(30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. . . .
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?