Addison v. Duncan et al

Filing 8

ORDER dismissing this case without prejudice due to a lack of prosecution. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/22/2015. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON v. PLAINTIFF NO. 3:15CV00036 JLH/JTR BRETT DUNCAN, Administrator, Craighead County Detention Center, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Nicholas Cortez Addison has filed his pro se § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights. On March 13, 2015, the Court entered an Order giving Addison thirty days to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Document #5. Addison never received a copy of that Order because he was released from custody without providing a forwarding address, as he was obligated to do. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Further, the time for Addison to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis has expired. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. This case is dismissed without prejudice due to a lack of prosecution. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 22nd day of April, 2015. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?