Edwards v. Whinfield et al

Filing 30

ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Motion for Discovery. In the future, Plaintiff shall request discovery from Defendants prior to petitioning the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/6/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION VICTOR LEMAR EDWARDS, ADC #500959 v. PLAINTIFF 3:15CV00040-DPM-JTK LUTHER WHINFIELD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery (Doc. No. 25) is DENIED without prejudice. According to Defendants’ response (Doc. No. 29), Plaintiff did not previously request discovery from Defendants; therefore, Defendants are treating the Motion as a request for discovery, and intend to respond within thirty days of their receipt of the Motion. In the future, Plaintiff shall request discovery from Defendants prior to petitioning the Court. See FED.R.CIV.P. 33, 34. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2015. ______________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?