Edwards v. Whinfield et al
ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Motion for Discovery. In the future, Plaintiff shall request discovery from Defendants prior to petitioning the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/6/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
VICTOR LEMAR EDWARDS,
LUTHER WHINFIELD, et al.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery (Doc. No. 25) is DENIED without prejudice. According
to Defendants’ response (Doc. No. 29), Plaintiff did not previously request discovery from
Defendants; therefore, Defendants are treating the Motion as a request for discovery, and intend to
respond within thirty days of their receipt of the Motion. In the future, Plaintiff shall request
discovery from Defendants prior to petitioning the Court. See FED.R.CIV.P. 33, 34.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2015.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?