Anstiss v. Huckabee et al
Filing
10
ORDER adopting 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff Kristopher Michael Anstiss's complaint against Defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/30/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
KRISTOPHER MICHAEL ANSTISS
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:15-cv-00046-KGB-JTK
ALLISON HUCKABEE, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 7).
time for filing objections has passed.
There have been no objections filed, and the
After a review of those Proposed Findings and
Recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
The Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiff Kristopher Michael Anstiss=s
complaint against defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2.
Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment
dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2015.
____________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?