Hamilton v. Hitt et al

Filing 26

ORDER directing the Clerk to forward an IFP application to plaintiff. Plaintiff is directed to submit the $350 filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application, and file it, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of his complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 1/13/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION HOUSTON CLAY HAMILTON V. PLAINTIFF NO: 3:15CV00055 DPM/PSH BECKY HITT et al DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Houston Clay Hamilton, a former inmate, filed a pro se complaint (docket entry 2), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on February 25, 2015, and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (docket entry 3). On December 21, 2015, plaintiff filed a change of address notice indicating that he has now been released from custody (docket entry 23). When a plaintiff is released from confinement, the Court’s policy is to require re-submission of affidavits to determine whether he should be required to pay all, or a portion of, the fees and costs of the lawsuit. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he is directed pay the $350.00 filing fee, or to resubmit an IFP application which reflects his free-world financial status, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of this lawsuit. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk is directed to forward an IFP application to plaintiff. 2. Plaintiff is directed to submit the $350.00 filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application, and file it, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Plaintiff’s failure to 1 do so will result in the recommended dismissal of his complaint. DATED this 13th day of January, 2016. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?