Rodriguez v. Whitfield et al
Filing
76
ORDER adopting the 74 Recommended Disposition. Granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Felix Rodriguez's inadequate medical care and treatment claim is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, appointed counsel's motion for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, 75 , is granted. The Clerk is directed to pay $1,001.11 from the Court's library fund. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/17/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
FELIX RODRIGUEZ
ADC #143927
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:15CV00079 BSM
LUTHER WHITFIELD, Lieutenant,
Mississippi County Detention Center, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 74] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
reviewing the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, defendants Chris Stankawitz and Luther Whitfield’s motion for
summary judgment [Doc. No. 61] and defendant Gerald Stipanuk’s motion for summary
judgment [Doc. No. 65] are granted, and plaintiff Felix Rodriguez’s inadequate medical care
and treatment claim is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, appointed counsel’s motion for
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses [Doc. No. 75] is granted. The clerk is directed to
pay $1,001.11 from the court’s library fund to the following address:
Koch Law Firm, P.A.
2024 Arkansas Valley Drive, Suite 707
Little Rock, AR 72212
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of October 2016.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?