Rodriguez v. Whitfield et al

Filing 76

ORDER adopting the 74 Recommended Disposition. Granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Felix Rodriguez's inadequate medical care and treatment claim is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, appointed counsel's motion for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, 75 , is granted. The Clerk is directed to pay $1,001.11 from the Court's library fund. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/17/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION FELIX RODRIGUEZ ADC #143927 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:15CV00079 BSM LUTHER WHITFIELD, Lieutenant, Mississippi County Detention Center, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 74] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After reviewing the record, the RD is adopted. Accordingly, defendants Chris Stankawitz and Luther Whitfield’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 61] and defendant Gerald Stipanuk’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 65] are granted, and plaintiff Felix Rodriguez’s inadequate medical care and treatment claim is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, appointed counsel’s motion for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses [Doc. No. 75] is granted. The clerk is directed to pay $1,001.11 from the court’s library fund to the following address: Koch Law Firm, P.A. 2024 Arkansas Valley Drive, Suite 707 Little Rock, AR 72212 IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of October 2016. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?