James v. Duncan et al
ORDER granting 20 Motion to Compel. Mr. James has until November 12, 2015, to respond to the discovery requests at issue. If he fails to comply with this Order, he risks having some or all of his claims dismissed, without prejudice. The 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied for reasons explained in a previous order, 2 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/14/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TARONE L. JAMES
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00080 DPM/BD
BRENT DUNCAN, et al.
Separate Defendants Bentley, Jackson, and Reece have moved for an order
compelling Mr. James to respond to their discovery requests. (Docket entry #20) The
motion (#20) is GRANTED.
Mr. James has until November 12, 2015, to respond to the discovery requests at
issue. If he fails to comply with this order, he risks having some or all of his claims
dismissed, without prejudice. See Local Rule 5.5.
Mr. James has moved for court-appointed counsel. (#21) That motion is DENIED
for reasons explained in a previous order (#2).
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of October, 2015.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?