Windchimes by Russco III Inc v. Big Lots Inc et al

Filing 4

ORDER giving notice to the Plaintiff that the Court will dismiss this action unless proof of service is filed on or before Thursday, September 24, 2015, or the Plaintiff establishes good cause for the failure to serve summons and complaint on the defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/17/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION WINDCHIMES BY RUSSCO III, INC. v. PLAINTIFF NO. 3:15CV00088 JLH BIG LOTS, INC.; BIG LOTS STORES, INC.; and CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action on April 7, 2015. More than 120 days have passed. Plaintiff has not filed proof of service on the defendants. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court – on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff – must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. Notice is hereby given to the plaintiff that the Court will dismiss this action unless proof of service is filed on or before Thursday, September 24, 2015, or the plaintiff establishes good cause for the failure to serve summons and complaint on the defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2015. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?