Addison et al v. Doe
Filing
22
ORDER adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The Court dismisses without prejudice this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court denies as moot Mr. Addison's motion to appoint counsel, 19 . The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/19/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 3:15-cv-00108-KGB-JTK
JANE DOE
DEFENDANT
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 18). No objections have been filed,
and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court approves and
adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in
all respects. Therefore, the Court dismisses without prejudice this case for failure to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted. The Court denies as moot Mr. Addison’s motion to appoint
counsel (Dkt. No. 19). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith.
It is so ordered this 19th day of November, 2015.
______________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?