James et al v. Martin
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 6 and 13 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects. The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiffs' claims. The Court denies as moot plaintiffs' motions to proceed IFP, 1 and 4 . The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/30/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JONNY JAMES and
NICHOLAS ADDISON
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 3:15-cv-00132-KGB-JJV
JOEY MARTIN, Jail Administrator,
Poinsett County Detention Center
DEFENDANT
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on May 27, 2015, and June 17, 2015 (Dkt. Nos. 6,
13). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in
their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
The Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiffs’ claims.
2.
The Court denies as moot plaintiffs’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt.
Nos. 1, 4).
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 30th day of November, 2015.
____________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?