Willcockson et al v. Martin
ORDER allowing Mr. Addison to file a response opposing the motion, 33 . To be considered, the response must be filed within fourteen days of this Order. If Mr. Addison files a response, he must also file a separate, short statement setting forth the disputed facts that he believes must be decided at a trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/20/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00154 DPM/BD
Defendant Martin has moved for summary judgment on all claims in this lawsuit.
(Docket entry #33) Mr. Addison now has an opportunity to file a response opposing the
motion. To be considered, the response must be filed within fourteen (14) days of this
In opposing the motion for summary judgment, Mr. Addison may attach affidavits
that he or others have signed. Because affidavits are sworn statements, they must be
either notarized or declared under penalty of perjury (see 28 U.S.C. § 1746). Unsworn
statements will not be considered in deciding the motion for summary judgment. And to
be considered, an affidavit must be based on the personal knowledge of the person who
If Mr. Addison files a response, he must also file a separate, short statement setting
forth the disputed facts that he believes must be decided at a trial. See Local Rule 56.1,
Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. While Mr.
Addison is not required to file a response to the Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment, if he does not respond, the Court can assume that the facts set out in the
Defendant’s Statement of Facts (#35) are true.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 20th day of October, 2015.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?