Addison v. Martin

Filing 13

ORDER: The Court mistakenly entered its most recent Order, 12 , in the wrong case. Order 12 vacated. Unopposed recommendation 11 adopted with a correction. Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a "strike". Motions 5 and 6 denied as moot. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/11/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION NICHOLAS ADDISON v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:15-cv-164-DPM-JWC JOEY MARTIN, Administrator, Poinsett County Detention Center DEFENDANT ORDER 1. Mr. Addison has filed many cases against many of the same people. The Court mistakenly entered its most recent Order, NQ 12, in the wrong Addison v. Martin. Order, NQ 12, vacated. The Court will enter a new Order in the other case. 2. Unopposedrecommendation,NQ 11,adopted with a correction.* FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Notes). Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Motions, NQ 5 & NQ 6, denied as moot. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). *Conley v. Gibson, NQ 11 at 2, was decided in 1957 rather than 1967. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge It -2- ifvpf J..Oif?

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?