Addison v. Martin
ORDER adopting 8 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff Addison's Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 4 , and to Appoint Counsel, 5 & 6 , are denied. Plaintiff's motion to set the case for trial, 9 , i s denied. Should Plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk within ten days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/12/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff Addison’s Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 4) and to
Appoint Counsel (Doc. No. 5 and 6) are DENIED.
Plaintiff’s motion to set the case for trial (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED.
Should Plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of
$400.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this
Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the
case will be reopened.
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2015.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?