Addison v. Richmond et al
ORDER adopting 6 unopposed recommendation. Addison's complaint fails to state a claim. Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal counts as another "strike". An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/11/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
RICHMOND, Correctional Officer,
Poinsett County Detention Center;
JOEY MARTIN, Administrator, Poinsett
County Detention Center; LARRY MILLS,
Sheriff, Poinsett County Detention Center; and
KEVIN MOULDER, Chief, Poinsett County
Unopposed recommendation, NQ 6, adopted as modifi d. FED. R. CIV.
P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Notes). Add son asks what
the procedure is for paying the filing fee. NQ 7 at 2. But payi g the filing fee
would be pointless because Addison's complaint fails to state a claim.
Addison cannot recover money promised as a bribe.
E. ., Kansas City
Operating Corp. v. Durwood, 278 F.2d 354, 358 (8th Cir. 196 ); NQ 2 at 4-6.
Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.
counts as another ustrike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915( ). An in forma
pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgmen would not be
taken in good faith.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Jud e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?