Addison v. Richmond et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 6 unopposed recommendation. Addison's complaint fails to state a claim. Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal counts as another "strike". An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/11/2015. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
PLAINTIFF

v.

No. 3:15-cv-199-DPM-JWC

RICHMOND, Correctional Officer,
Poinsett County Detention Center;
JOEY MARTIN, Administrator, Poinsett
County Detention Center; LARRY MILLS,
Sheriff, Poinsett County Detention Center; and
KEVIN MOULDER, Chief, Poinsett County
Detention Center

EFENDANTS

ORDER
Unopposed recommendation, NQ 6, adopted as modifi d. FED. R. CIV.
P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Notes). Add son asks what
the procedure is for paying the filing fee. NQ 7 at 2. But payi g the filing fee
would be pointless because Addison's complaint fails to state a claim.
Addison cannot recover money promised as a bribe.

E. ., Kansas City

Operating Corp. v. Durwood, 278 F.2d 354, 358 (8th Cir. 196 ); NQ 2 at 4-6.
Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.

his dismissal

counts as another ustrike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915( ). An in forma

pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgmen would not be
taken in good faith.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Jud e

-2-