King v. Roundsville et al
ORDER allowing King an opportunity to file responses in opposition to the motions for summary judgment, 24 $ 32 . To be considered, the responses must be filed within fourteen days of this order's entry date. If King files a response, he must also file a separate short statement setting forth the disputed facts that he believes must be decided at a trial. While King is not required to file a response to the motions for summary judgment, if he does not respond, the Court can assume that the facts set out in the statement of facts, 26 & 34 , are true. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 8/4/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TYLON CALVIN KING
NO: 3:15CV00213 PSH
ROB ROUNDSVILLE et al
Defendants have moved for summary judgment as to some claims plaintiff Tylon Calvin
King has raised against them (Doc. Nos. 24 & 32). King now has an opportunity to file responses
opposing the motions. To be considered, the responses must be filed within fourteen (14) days of
this order’s entry date.1
In opposing the motions for summary judgment, King may attach affidavits that he or others
have signed. Because affidavits are sworn statements, they must be either notarized or declared
under penalty of perjury (see 28 U.S.C. § 1746). Unsworn statements will not be considered in
deciding the motion for summary judgment. And to be considered, an affidavit must be based on
the personal knowledge of the person who signs it.
If King files a response, he must also file a separate, short statement setting forth the disputed
facts that he believes must be decided at a trial. See Local Rule 56.1, Rules of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. While King is not required to file a response to
the motions for summary judgment, if he does not respond, the Court can assume that the facts set
King has already filed a response to the motion filed by defendants Dale Cook, Clayburn
Hicks, Rob Roundsville, and Luther Whitfield (Doc. No. 27).
out in the statements of facts (Doc. Nos. 26 & 34) are true.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of August, 2016.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?