Chisem v. Coleman et al

Filing 39

ORDER adopting 30 Recommendation as modified and overruling 34 Chisem's objections. The modification: Chisem has now submitted a paper disputing portions of the Defendants' Statement of Facts. The record shows that jail personnel ev aluated and treated Chisem several times during his stay at the Crittenden County Detention Center. And Chisem hasn't met proof with proof to show that the Defendants were nonetheless deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Defendant's 26 motion for summary judgment is granted. Chisem' s claims against Childress and Dickerson for inadequate medical treatment will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/6/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
CLINT B. CHISEM
ADC #146469

v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 3:15-cv-218-DPM

MANDY CHILDRESS, Nurse, Medical
Department Administrator; and MARNI
DICKERSON, Medical Department Nurse

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, NQ 30, as
modified and overrules Chisem's objections, NQ 34. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3).
The modification: Chisem has now submitted a paper disputing portions of
the Defendants' Statement of Facts. Compare NQ 34 with NQ 30 at 5. But
Magistrate Judge Volpe's conclusion still holds. The record shows that jail
personnel evaluated and treated Chisem several times during his stay at the
Crittenden County Detention Center. And Chisem hasn't met proof with
proof to show that the Defendants were nonetheless deliberately indifferent
to his serious medical needs. NQ 30 at 5-6. Defendants' motion for summary
judgment, NQ 26, is therefore granted. Chisem' s claims against Childress and
Dickerson for inadequate medical treatment will be dismissed with prejudice.

So Ordered.

D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge

-2-