GE Capital Commercial Inc v. Bland Family Farms LLC et al

Filing 34

ORDER denying without prejudice 30 and 32 motions for service of a writ of execution. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/8/2025. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION

PLAINTIFF

BMO HARRIS BANK NA

No. 3:15 -cv-247-DPM

V.

BLAND FAMILY FARMS, LLC; SARAH
BLAND; and JAMEY BLAND

DEFENDANTS

ORDER

1. G.E. Capital's first motion for service of a writ of execution,
Doc. 30, is denied without prejudice. It was mooted by its second
motion.

2. G.E. Capital's second motion for service of a writ of execution,

Doc. 32, is denied without prejudice.

The Clerk issued a writ in

June 2023. By its terms, though, the writ was valid for one year.
Doc. 29 at TI. G.E. Capital did not move for service by the U.S. Marshal

until November 2024. Plus, G.E. Capital argues that the Blands may
have wages subject to collection. Doc. 33 at 2. Whatever cash they

might have in their pockets on a given day would be subject to
execution. But a writ of garnishment is the better way to reach wages.
E.g., Moory v. Quadras, Inc., 333 Ark. 624,628,970 S.W.2d 275,277(1998).

So Ordered.

Jr.'

D.P. Marshall
United States District Judge

M4V'ot47' -oa

-2-