Addison v. Martin et al

Filing 4

ORDER adopting 3 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Addison's application to proceed in forma pauperis, 1 , is denied, and his complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/8/2015. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
v.

PLAINTIFF
NO: 3:15CV00268 JLH

JOEY MARTIN et al

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Addison’s application for leave to proceed in forma paupeirs (docket entry 1) is

DENIED, and his complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Addison wishes to
continue this case, he must submit the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 to the Clerk of the
Court, noting the above case style number, within thirty (30) days of the case’s dismissal, along with
a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be
reopened.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 8th day of October, 2015.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE