Addison v. Martin et al
ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. If Addison wants to pursue this case, then he must pay the $400 filing and administrative fees and file a motion to reopen this case by 15 October 2015. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/15/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
JOEY MARTIN, Jail Administrator, Poinsett
County Detention Center; PHILLIS CRAFT,
Cook, Poinsett County Detention Center; and
DOE, Wonda, Cook, Poinsett County
Addison moves to proceed in forma pauperis in this§ 1983 case; but he
is a three-striker. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Before filing this lawsuit, Addison had
at least five cases dismissed for failing to state a claim. E.g., Addison v. Martin,
3:15-cv-1-JM;Addisonv.Martin,3:15-cv-91-DPM;Addisonv.Martin,3:15-cv-96DPM;Addison v. Doe, 3:15-cv-121-DPM; and Addison v. Muse, 3:15-cv-133-JM.
And nothing in the complaint suggests that he's in imminent danger of
serious physical injury. Ibid. His application to proceed in forma pauperis, NQ
1, is therefore denied.
Addison's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma
pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be
taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). If Addison wants to pursue this
case, then he must pay $400.00 (the filing fee and administrative fees) and file
a motion to reopen the case by 15 October 2015.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
1§' ~k~ ;;J.OJS'"
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?