Addison v. Corbell et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting in their entirety 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects. Accordingly, the Court denies Mr. Addison's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. If Mr. Addison wants to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/7/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:15-cv-00276-KGB-JTK MEGAN CORBELL, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome Kearney (Dkt. No. 3). Plaintiff Nicholas Cortez Addison has filed an objection to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 5). After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Mr. Addison’s timely objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Accordingly, the Court denies Mr. Addison’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3), and this case is dismissed without prejudice. If Mr. Addison wants to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400.00 to the Clerk of the Court, noting the above case style and number within 14 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. SO ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2016. ____________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?