Addison v. Corbell et al
Filing
9
ORDER adopting in their entirety 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects. Accordingly, the Court denies Mr. Addison's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. If Mr. Addison wants to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/7/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:15-cv-00276-KGB-JTK
MEGAN CORBELL, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome Kearney (Dkt. No. 3). Plaintiff Nicholas Cortez Addison has filed an
objection to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 5). After careful review of
the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Mr. Addison’s timely objections, and a de novo
review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects.
Accordingly, the Court denies Mr. Addison’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt.
No. 3), and this case is dismissed without prejudice.
If Mr. Addison wants to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of
$400.00 to the Clerk of the Court, noting the above case style and number within 14 days of the
date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full
payment, the case will be reopened.
SO ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2016.
____________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?