Addison v. Martin et al
ORDER adopting 3 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied and his complaint is dismissed without prejudice. If plaint iff wishes to continue this case, he must submit the filing and administrative fees of $400 to the Clerk of the Court within thirty days of the case's dismissal, along with a motion to reopen the case. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/8/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
NO: 3:15CV00287 BRW
JOEY MARTIN et al
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (docket entry 1) is
DENIED, and his complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If plaintiff wishes to
continue this case, he must submit the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 to the Clerk of the
Court, noting the above case style number, within thirty (30) days of the case’s dismissal, along with
a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 8th day of October, 2015.
/s/Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?