Addison v. Martin et al
ORDER dismissing without prejudice Addison's complaint, 2 . The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Order, the accompanying Judgment, and Judge Volpe's prior Order, 3 , to Mr. Addison at the address he provided most recently. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/15/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NICHOLAS CORTEZ ADDISON
Case No. 3:15-cv-00289 KGB
JOEY MARTIN, Jail Administrator,
Poinsett County Detention Center, et al.
On September 15, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe concluded that
plaintiff Nicholas Cortez Addison was a “three-striker” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(g) (Dkt. No. 3). In his Order, Judge Volpe directed Mr. Addison to submit the full filing
fee within 14 days from entry of the Order and warned that Mr. Addison’s failure to do so would
result in this action being dismissed without prejudice. More than 14 days have passed since
Judge Volpe’s Order was entered, and Mr. Addison has not submitted the fee. Judge Volpe filed
Proposed Findings and Recommendations recommending that this Court dismiss without
prejudice Mr. Addison’s action in accordance with the prior Order (Dkt. No. 12). No objections
to those Proposed Findings and Recommendations have been filed.
It is therefore ordered that Mr. Addison’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice (Dkt.
No. 2). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. The
Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Order, the accompanying judgment, and Judge Volpe’s
prior Order (Dkt. No. 3) to Mr. Addison at the address he provided most recently (Dkt. No. 6).
Dated this 15th day of July, 2016.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?