Addison v. Martin
Filing
3
ORDER denying 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nicholas Addison. His complaint, 2 , is dismissed without prejudice. Addison has thirty days from the entry of this order to pay the $400 filing fee in full and file a motion to reopen the case. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/5/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
NICHOLAS ADDISON
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:15CV00314 BSM
JOEY MARTIN
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Plaintiff Nicholas Addison’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1]
is denied, and this case is dismissed without prejudice.
A prisoner cannot proceed in forma pauperis if he “has on 3 or more prior occasions,
while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the
United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of
serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Prior to filing this case, Addison had at least
five cases dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See
Addison v. Martin, Case No. 3:15CV00001 (E.D. Ark. 2015); Addison v. Martin, Case No.
3:15CV00009 (E.D. Ark. 2015); Addison v. Martin, Case No. 3:15CV00096 (E.D. Ark.
2015); Addison v. Doe, Case No. 3:15CV00121 (E.D. Ark. 2015); Addison v. Muse, Case No.
3:15CV00133 (E.D. Ark. 2015). The imminent danger exception is not applicable because
the complaint does not suggest that he is in danger.
Accordingly, Addison’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] is
denied, and his complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice. Addison has thirty
(30) days from the entry of this order to pay the $400 filing fee in full and file a motion to
reopen the case.
DATED this 5th day of October 2015.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?