London et al v. Beck et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiffs K. Abrem and Steven Hunter are dismissed without prejudice for failure to submit a completed IFP Applicatio n or their shares of the statutory filing fee. Plaintiff Jerrick London's claims were dismissed without prejudice on December 21, 2015. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/22/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JERRICK LAMONT LONDON, ADC #601135; K. ABREM, ADC #145156; and STEVEN HUNTER, ADC #610955 v. PLAINTIFFS No. 3:15CV00330 JLH RON BECK, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs K. Abrem and Steven Hunter are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to submit a completed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit or their shares of the statutory filing fee. 2. Plaintiff Jerrick London’s claims were DISMISSED without prejudice on December 21, 2015. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2015. ___________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?