Baker et al v. Does et al
ORDER adopting 17 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in all respects. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 12/2/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DOES; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After considering
the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court approves and adopts the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2015.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?