Gray v. Hall et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendation. Mr. Gray's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's prior order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/3/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
RUBBY JAMES GRAY
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:15-cv-343 KGB/PSH

MATT HALL, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 7). No objections have been filed,
and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes
that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.

Mr. Gray’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing

fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s prior order.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
Dated this 3rd day of February, 2016.

____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge