Parker v. Cagle et al

Filing 1

ORDER docketed in new case as to William Parker pursuant to Order in case 3:15-cv-00338. Directing the Clerk of Court to open a new case for William Parker and to file a copy of his Amended Complaint, Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP and the Order allowing Mr. Parker to proceed IFP in the new case. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 11/13/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ROBERT BAKER and WILLIAM PARKER v. PLAINTIFFS 3:15CV00338-BRW-JJV DOES; et al. DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiffs Robert Baker and William Parker jointly filed this action on October 21, 2015. (Doc. No. 2.) Now, in his Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 13), Plaintiff Parker has indicated a desire to pursue his claims separately. After review of both Plaintiffs’ allegations, the Court concludes that severance is proper. Plaintiffs’ claims do not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence.1 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to open a new case for William Parker and file a copy of his Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 13), Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 10), and the Order allowing Mr. Parker to proceed IFP (Doc. No. 11) in the new case. The Clerk of Court is also directed to terminate Mr. Parker as a party to this action. IT IS SO ORDERED, 13th day of November, 2015. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 See FED. R. CIV. P. 20(a) (providing that multiple plaintiffs may join in one lawsuit if they assert a right to relief “arising out of the same transaction” or occurrence that involves a common “question of law or fact”); FED. R. CIV. P. 21 (explaining that a court may sua sponte sever improperly joined claims).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?