Berry v. Doss et al
ORDER adopting 31 partial recommended disposition in all respects. Berry's claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Doss, McFarlin, Sparks, and Hardesty will proceed. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/22/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WILLARD EUGENE BERRY
CASE NO. 3:15CV00378 BSM
BRIAN DOSS, et al.
The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Beth Deere and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering
these documents and reviewing the record de novo, the partial recommended disposition is
hereby adopted in all respects. In his objection, plaintiff Willard Berry states that he does
not speak the language of the court, and it appears that he thinks Judge Deere is
recommending the dismissal of all of his claims. So that it is plainly clear, Judge Deere has
merely recommended the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff’s claims against the “John
Doe” or unidentified defendants.
Berry’s claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff’s
claims against defendants Doss, McFarlin, Sparks, and Hardesty will proceed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of June 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?