Berry v. Doss et al

Filing 35

ORDER adopting 31 partial recommended disposition in all respects. Berry's claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Doss, McFarlin, Sparks, and Hardesty will proceed. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/22/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION WILLARD EUGENE BERRY V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:15CV00378 BSM BRIAN DOSS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and reviewing the record de novo, the partial recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects. In his objection, plaintiff Willard Berry states that he does not speak the language of the court, and it appears that he thinks Judge Deere is recommending the dismissal of all of his claims. So that it is plainly clear, Judge Deere has merely recommended the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff’s claims against the “John Doe” or unidentified defendants. Berry’s claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Doss, McFarlin, Sparks, and Hardesty will proceed. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of June 2016. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?