Schmitt v. Marshall et al
Filing
22
ORDER adopting 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Schmitt's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, and it is hereby certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/2/2017. (jak)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JORDAN SCHMITT
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00001 BSM
TRISH MARSHALL and SUSAN COX
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 20] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. Plaintiff Jordan Schmitt has
not filed objections.
After careful consideration, the proposed findings and
recommendations are adopted in their entirety.
Accordingly, Schmitt’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice, and it is hereby
certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of February 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
