Bell et al v. Craighead County Jail
ORDER approving and adopting 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety; denying plaintiff Lakhraj Manohar's 6 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing without preju dice Lakhraj Manohar's 1 complaint for failure to pay the filing fee; dismissing without prejudice the claims of plaintiffs Richard Allen Bell, Tommy Moody, and Aaron E. Watson for failure to prosecute; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/02/2016. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RICHARD ALLEN BELL et al.
Case No. 3:16-cv-00036-KGB
CRAIGHEAD COUNTY JAIL
(“Recommendation”) filed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 10). No objections
have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review of the
Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is,
approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in its entirety.
It is therefore ordered that:
The Court denies plaintiff Lakhraj Manohar’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 6), and the Court dismisses without prejudice Lakhraj Manohar’s
complaint for failure to pay the filing fee.
The Court dismisses without prejudice the claims of plaintiffs Richard Allen Bell,
Tommy Moody, and Aaron E. Watson for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 5.5 and for
failure to pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis .
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered this the 2nd day of May, 2016.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?