Stanback v. Chadwick et al

Filing 13

ORDER adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all respects. Plaintiff Jeffery Mark Stanback's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and f ailure to respond to the Court's order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing his action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/19/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JEFFERY MARK STANBACK
v.

PLAINTIFF
NO. 3:16CV00058 JLH

A. CHADWICK, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff Jeffery Mark Stanback’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond
to the Court’s orders.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 19th day of July, 2016.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE