Medlock v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of

Filing 34

JUDGMENT consistent with 33 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/22/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
RANDY MEDLOCK
v.

PLAINTIFF
3:16CV00095-JM

CITY OF WEST MEMPHIS, ARKANSAS

DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT
Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and
ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Dismissal of this action counts as a
“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 22nd day of November, 2016.

_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1