Sims v. King et al
Filing
15
ORDER directing the Clerk to forward an IFP application to Sims. Sims is directed to submit the $350 filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application, and file it, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Sims' failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of his complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 6/14/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
HAROLD SHAWGNESSY SIMS
ADC #650028
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO: 3:16CV00099 JM/PSH
KING et al
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On April 11, 2016, plaintiff Harold Shawgnessy Sims, at the time an inmate in the Arkansas
Department of Correction (“ADC”), filed a pro se complaint (Doc. No. 2) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983. He was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
(Doc. No. 3). On June 13, 2016, Sims filed a notice indicating that he is no longer incarcerated by
the ADC, and providing a current address for receipt of mail (Doc. No. 14).
When a plaintiff is released from confinement, the Court’s policy is to require re-submission
of affidavits to determine whether he should be required to pay all, or a portion of, the fees and costs
of the lawsuit. If Sims wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he is directed pay the $350.00 filing fee,
or to resubmit an IFP application which reflects his free-world financial status, no later than 30 days
after the entry date of this order. Sims’ failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of
this lawsuit.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Clerk is directed to forward an IFP application to Sims.
2.
Sims is directed to submit the $350.00 filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP
application, and file it, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Sims’ failure to do
so will result in the recommended dismissal of his complaint.
1
DATED this 14th day of June, 2016.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?