McFarland v. Nestle USA Inc et al

Filing 20

ORDER granting the 19 Motion to Extend the stay. The stay is extended up to and including 12/12/2016. Should the parties be unable to settle this matter by 12/12/2016, they must either file a status report and request an extension of stay if settle ment is feasible or inform the Court that further negotiations would not be productive. If they determine that further negotiations would not be productive, the parties must file their Rule 26(f) report within seven days after the stay is lifted, and the defendants must file a response to the plaintiff's motion to certify class within fourteen days after the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/14/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JOY MCFARLAND, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. PLAINTIFF NO. 3:16CV00100 JLH NESTLE USA, INC.; and NESTLE PREPARED FOODS COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER Pursuant to the Order entered on October 11, 2016, the parties have filed a joint status report and motion to extend stay pending resolution of settlement discussions. The motion to extend the stay is GRANTED. Document #19. The stay is extended up to and including December 12, 2016. Should the parties be unable to settle this matter by December 12, 2016, they must either (a) file a status report and request an extension of stay if settlement is feasible but will take more time, or (b) inform the Court that further negotiations would not be productive. If they determine that further negotiations would not be productive, the parties must file their Rule 26(f) report within seven days after the stay is lifted, and the defendants must file a response to the plaintiff’s motion to certify class within fourteen days after the stay is lifted. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2016. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?