Morley et al v. Medic One LLC et al

Filing 90

ORDER denying 76 and 86 Motions. The Court notes Air Evac's preservation of its arguments and denies its motions on the cross-claims. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/30/2018. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
ROY MORLEY and WENDY MORLEY

v.

PLAINTIFFS

No. 3:16-cv-110-DPM

MEDIC ONE LLC, d/b/a Medic One-Arkansas;
DANIEL RIVERA; DESIREE HAWKINS BYRD;
JOHN DOES, 1-6; AIR EV AC EMS, INC., d/b/a
Air Ev ac Lifeteam; JIM TOLEWITZKE;
BROOKLAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT;
and AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE
INSURANCE CORPORATION

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Air Evac' s motions to strike and dismiss cross-claims, NQ 76 &
NQ 86, are denied. Th e Court has already ruled on the timing issues.
NQ 72. It also granted permission for Med ic On e's cross-claim. The

Brookland defendants h ave stated claims for contribution and
in demnity, too. Given that those w ho are potentially resp on sible to the
Morleys are parties, the a pportionment issu e seem s straightforward.
Th ere is n o limitations issu e. But this case is bogged down in the
pleadings. The Court therefore notes Air Evac' s preservation of its
arguments and denies its m otions on the cross-claims.

So Ordered.

J
I

D.P. Marshall
United States District Judge

-2-