Oliver v. Withfeild et al

Filing 6

ORDER: Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days from 5/11/2016. To date, plaintiff has not amended his complaint or otherwise responded. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. The 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations are moot. An in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/12/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
ARTEZ OLIVER
VS.

PLAINTIFF
3:16CV00122-BRW-JTK

LUTHER WITHFEILD, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

On May 11, 2016, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days.1
To date, Plaintiff has not amended his complaint or otherwise responded to the May 11, 2016
Order, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for failure to
prosecute.2 The Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Doc. No. 5) are MOOT.
An in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would
not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2016.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Doc. No. 3.

2

See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
1