Herron et al v. APAC of Tennessee Inc et al

Filing 326

ORDER denying 283 , 285 , 286 , and 293 Motions in Limine; tentatively granting 285 Motion in limine; mostly granting and partly denying 287 and 291 Motions in limine; denying as moot 290 Motion in limine; and approving 288 Motion. A revised set of proposed jury instructions, a list of suggested voir dire topics, a revised estimate of time needed for examination of each witness, and any revised deposition designations are due by 5/3/2019. Plaintiff must also notify by that date if Rhoades will be unable to testify at trial for medical reasons. Plaintiffs may file this notice under seal. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/17/2019. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION KENNY HERRON and MARY LOU HERRON, as Guardians of the Person and Estate of Cadence Nevaeh McGuire, a minor; MARY LOU HERRON, Administratrix of the Estates of Jessica M. McGuire and Brinley M. McGuire, a minor, and for their Wrongful Deaths; and CHARLES JEFF GARDNER, Administrator of the Estate of Nicholas McGuire and for his Wrongful Death v. PLAINTIFFS No. 3:16-cv-127-DPM J E PHILLIPS & SONS, INC.; BEST TRUCK & TRAILER, INC.; RICHARD CARL ADAMS; and WABASH NATIONAL CORPORATION d/b/a Wabash National Trailer Centers, Inc. DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. At the 15 April 2019 hearing, the Court laid out the framework for trial. The Court will conduct the voir dire with backup from counsel. Each side will get three peremptory strikes, along with the opportunity to seek strikes for cause and make Batson or J.E.B. challenges. We'll have a twelve-person jury. On the first Monday of trial, we'll select the jury, the Court will give preliminary instructions, and counsel will open. Plaintiffs will have forty-five minutes for their opening statement; and defendants will split an equivalent amount of time. We'll start the proof Tuesday morning. The Court prefers to run on a school day, from 8:30 a.m. until 3:30 or 4:00 p.m. Starting Tuesday, counsel should be prepared to give a three-minute statement about the proof expected that day. The jury will be able to ask clarifying questions of witnesses. No speaking objections will be allowed. 2. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the Court made the following rulings on pending motions. • Wabash's motion in limine Qoined by Best, Phillips, and Adams) to exclude Przybyla's testimony on Nicholas McGuire's reaction time, NQ 283, is denied. • Best's motion in limine to exclude Rhoades' s testimony on Best-related issues, NQ 284, is denied with instructions, clarifications, and a caveat about a limiting instruction. • Wabash's motion in limine Qoined by Best, Phillips, and Adams) to exclude Marsh, NQ 285, is tentatively granted. The Court will make a final ruling before trial. • Wabash's motion in limine Qoined by Phillips and Adams) to exclude Wade's weld and defect opinions and Rhoades' s weld and defect opinions, NQ 286, is denied. • Defendants' omnibus motion in limine, NQ 287, is mostly granted and partly denied. • Phillips and Adams' s motion in limine to exclude Przybyla and Rhoades, NQ 290, is denied as moot in light of the Court's other rulings. -2- • Plaintiffs' motion in limine, Ng 291, is mostly granted and partly denied. . , • Plaintiffs' motion zn limine regarding the rmnor s statements, Ng 293, is denied. • Best's joinder in Wabash's motions, Ng 288, is approved. Plaintiffs' ore ten us motion to exclude any reference to counsel's prior use of Bentley as an expert is denied. 3. A revised set of proposed jury instructions, a list of suggested voir dire topics, a revised estimate of time needed for examination of each witness, and any revised deposition designations are due by 3 May 2019. Plaintiffs must also notify the Court by that date if Rhoades will be unable to testify at trial for medical reasons. Plaintiffs may file this notice under seal. So Ordered. ~ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge /7 ~ -3- ).0t't

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?