Tri-State Armature & Electrical Works Inc v. Houston et al
Filing
51
ORDER noting 49 Tri-State's report of discovery dispute. The Court directs Tri-State to review the Scheduling Order about discovery disputes, 15 at 3. The Court directs EDE, Stripling, and Houston to respond to 49 in a joint paper by 5/17 /2017, guided by the limitations in the Scheduling Order. After receiving that response, the Court will decide if a hearing is necessary. Counsel should also inform chambers if they're available for a 10:30 a.m. hearing in Jonesboro on 5/24/2017 if one is needed. 50 Motion granted. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/11/2017. (jak)
- --
- - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- ------------ --- ----- ·
-
-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
TRI-STATE ARMATURE
& ELECTRICAL WORKS, INC.
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:16-cv-134-DPM
TIMOTHY B. HOUSTON; ELECTRO DESIGN
ENGINEERING, INC.; and CELETA STRIPLING
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Tri-State's report of discovery dispute, Ng 49, noted. The Court directs
Tri-State to review the Scheduling Order about discovery disputes, Ng 15 at 3.
Absent an emergency, these disputes should come to the Court in a joint
report, giving each side's position and attaching all material documents. This
process avoids the delays inherent in adversarial briefing, promotes
cooperation, narrows disagreements to what's truly disputed, and provides
the Court everything it needs in one bite.
Rather than ordering a do-over, though, to move things forward the
Court directs EDE, Stripling, and Houston to respond to Ng 49 in a joint pa per
by 17 May 2017, guided by the limitations in the Scheduling Order. After
receiving that response, the Court will decide if a hearing is necessary.
Counsel should also inform chambers if they're available for a 10:30 a.m.
hearing in Jonesboro on 24 May 2017, if one is needed. Motion, NQ 50,
granted.
So Ordered.
v
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
1t
-2-
fll1<¥j J.O I 7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?