Marks v. Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER granting 18 Motion to substitute counsel. Attorney Mark Kingsolver is relieved as counsel of record and Special Assistant United States Attorney Jonathan R. Clark is substituted as counsel for the Commissioner in this case and the Clerk is d irected to substitute Mr. Clark as counsel of record for the Commissioner. 15 Motion is granted and Plaintiff is awarded $3,140.47 in fees and expenses, subject to offset, if she has outstanding government debt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 8/2/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION LISA MARKS V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:16-CV-169-BD NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is the Commissioner’s motion to substitute counsel. (Docket entry #18) For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Special Assistant United States Attorney Mark Kingsolver is relieved as counsel of record, and Special Assistant United States Attorney Jonathan R. Clark is substituted as counsel for the Commissioner in this case. The Clerk is directed to substitute Mr. Clark as counsel of record for the Commissioner. Plaintiff Lisa Michelle Marks has moved for an award of attorney=s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. ' 2412. (#15) She seeks fees and expenses in the amount of $3,140.47. The Commissioner does not object to the amount requested. (#19) The Commissioner states, however, that the fees should be payable to Ms. Marks, subject to offset for any debt she may owe to the Government. Ms. Marks’s motion (#15) is GRANTED, and she is awarded $3,140.47 in fees and expenses, subject to offset, if she has outstanding government debt. DATED this 2nd day of August, 2017. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?