Stanton v. Nettleton School District et al

Filing 7

ORDER placing under seal documents 1 through 6 . The Court directs the Plaintiff and all other parties in the future not to use the name of the minor in any document filed in the Clerk's office. Rather, the minor will be identified as "J DS". The Clerk will not accept for filing any document in which the name of the minor is disclosed. The Court directs the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, the amended complaint, and a copy of this Order upon the Nettleton School District and Brian Carter without cost to the plaintiff. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/26/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION REVA MARQUE STANTON, on behalf of JDS, a Minor v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:16CV00179 JLH NETTLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT; and BRIAN CARTER, Principal, Nettleton High School DEFENDANTS ORDER In order to protect the privacy of JDS, a minor, Document Nos. 1 through 6 are hereby placed under seal. The Court directs the plaintiff, Reva Marque Stanton, and all other parties in the future not to use the name of the minor in any document filed in the Clerk’s Office. Rather, the minor will be identified as “JDS.” The Clerk will not accept for filing any document in which the name of the minor is disclosed. For screening purposes only, the Court concludes that the amended complaint (Document #6) states a claim upon which relief may be granted against the Nettleton School District and Brian Carter. The Court has previously granted Stanton’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court therefore directs the United States Marshals Service to serve the summons, the amended complaint, and a copy of this Order upon the Nettleton School District and Brian Carter without cost to the plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2016. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?