Ferguson v. Marshall et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Jaiden Michelle Renee Ferguson's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief m ay be granted. This dismissal counts as a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/6/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JAIDEN MICHELLE RENEE FERGUSON
v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 3:16-cv-00229 KGB/PSH

PATRICIA MARSHALL, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“Recommendation”)
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 5). No objections have
been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court
concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety
as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that plaintiff Jaiden Michelle Renee Ferguson’s complaint is dismissed
without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal
counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma
pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and
not in good faith.
It is so ordered this 6th day of December, 2016.

KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE