Franks v. Hammell
Filing
6
JUDGMENT consistent with this Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
BELINDA K. FRANKS
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:16-cv-00247-KGB
STEPHEN HAMMELL
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Consistent with the Order filed on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that
plaintiff Belinda K. Franks’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice. The relief sought is
denied. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),
and the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal taken
from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
It is so adjudged this the 27th day of June, 2017.
_______________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?