BMO Harris Bank NA v. RAD Transportation LLC et al
Filing
14
ORDER: The Court needs more information from BMO Harris Bank before it can decide the motion for default judgment. Addendum due by 2/17/2017. RAD has filed an untimely answer, but no response to the motion. RAD needs to do two things: response to the motion, and either move to answer out of time, or explain why its answer was timely. RAD's paper due by 3/3/2017. If RAD remains silent, the Court will strike its answer. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/9/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
BMO HARRIS BANK NA
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:16-cv-272-DPM
RAD TRANSPORTATION LLC and
CHARLES S. BRIGHT
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
1. The Court needs more information from BMO Harris Bank before it
can decide the motion for default judgment.
Please file an addendum
explaining how the following amounts were either incurred or calculated:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Unpaid and accelerated loan balances of $475,566
Repossession costs of $600
Late fees of $3,446
Pre-Complaint interest of $18,225
Proceeds of $54,572 from resale of collateral
Attorney fees of $2,500 (by hours and rate)
Costs of collection of $793.39
Interest of $202.80 per day since filing the complaint
Addendum due by 17 February 2017.
2. RAD has filed what appears to be an untimely answer, but no
response to the motion. RAD needs to do two things: respond to the motion,
and either move to answer out of time,
FED.
R. Crv. P. 6(b)(l)(B), or explain
why its answer was timely. RAD's papers due by 3 March 2017. If RAD
remains silent, the Court will strike its answer.
So Ordered.
(/
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?