BMO Harris Bank NA v. RAD Transportation LLC et al

Filing 14

ORDER: The Court needs more information from BMO Harris Bank before it can decide the motion for default judgment. Addendum due by 2/17/2017. RAD has filed an untimely answer, but no response to the motion. RAD needs to do two things: response to the motion, and either move to answer out of time, or explain why its answer was timely. RAD's paper due by 3/3/2017. If RAD remains silent, the Court will strike its answer. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/9/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION BMO HARRIS BANK NA v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:16-cv-272-DPM RAD TRANSPORTATION LLC and CHARLES S. BRIGHT DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. The Court needs more information from BMO Harris Bank before it can decide the motion for default judgment. Please file an addendum explaining how the following amounts were either incurred or calculated: • • • • • • • • Unpaid and accelerated loan balances of $475,566 Repossession costs of $600 Late fees of $3,446 Pre-Complaint interest of $18,225 Proceeds of $54,572 from resale of collateral Attorney fees of $2,500 (by hours and rate) Costs of collection of $793.39 Interest of $202.80 per day since filing the complaint Addendum due by 17 February 2017. 2. RAD has filed what appears to be an untimely answer, but no response to the motion. RAD needs to do two things: respond to the motion, and either move to answer out of time, FED. R. Crv. P. 6(b)(l)(B), or explain why its answer was timely. RAD's papers due by 3 March 2017. If RAD remains silent, the Court will strike its answer. So Ordered. (/ D .P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?