Ash v. Social Security Administration

Filing 17

ORDER granting 14 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Because the award belongs to Ash, and not her attorney, as set forth in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the Department of Treasury shall issue payment of this award by check made payable to Ash, in care of her attorney, Stephanie Bartels Wallace, and shall mail the check to Ms. Wallace at her Jonesboro, Arkansas, address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 9/26/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION KAREN DENISE ASH VS. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:17CV00016 PSH NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT ORDER Now before the Court is the plaintiff Karen Denise Ash’s (“Ash”) motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill (“Berryhill”) does not oppose the motion. We grant the motion, approving an EAJA award in the total amount of $2,229.37 (fees in the amount of $2,209.30 plus expenses of $20.07). We find nothing unreasonable about the hours of work performed or the hourly rate requested. Because the award belongs to Ash, and not her attorney, as set forth in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the Department of Treasury shall issue payment of this award by check made payable to Ash, in care of her attorney, Stephanie Bartels Wallace, and shall mail the check to Ms. Wallace at her Jonesboro, Arkansas, address. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2017. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?