Hampton et al v. Earle Arkansas, City of et al

Filing 79

JUDGMENT in favor of Waldo Mcwane. Mr. McWane will have and recover from Defendant, the City of Earle, Arkansas, $1,225.00. Plaintiff's motion to enforce settlement agreement is granted as stated herein, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court will retain jurisdiction for 60 days to resolve any post-trial motions. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/1/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION TOMMY DALE HAMPTON, WALDO MCWANE and JERRY EAVES V. PLAINTIFFS 3:17CV00018 JM CITY OF EARLE, ARKANSAS, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement was tried to the Court on October 29, 2018, the Honorable James M. Moody, Jr. presiding. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court finds in favor of Plaintiff Waldo McWane. Mr. McWane will have and recover from Defendant, the City of Earle, Arkansas, one thousand, two hundred and twenty-five dollars ($1,225.00). Additionally, the Court finds that Mr. McWane was not terminated for cause by the City of Earle, Arkansas in May-June, 2017. Further, the City did not have good cause to fail to re-hire Mr. McWane as set forth in the settlement agreement between the parties. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiff’s motion to enforce settlement agreement is granted as stated herein, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court will retain jurisdiction for sixty (60) days to resolve any post-trial motions.1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2018. ______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. 1 The deadlines for filing post-trial motions set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are not extended by the Court’s retention of jurisdiction. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?