Oliver v. Cook et al
ORDER adopting 4 Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff Oliver's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike". An in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/14/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 3:17CV00039 BSM
DELL COOK, et al.
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 4] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
reviewing the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff Artez Oliver’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without
prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this
action constitutes a strike within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Finally, an in forma pauperis appeal from the order and judgment
dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of April 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?